Health 'rationing' - should patients decide?
Medical
science can now treat more diseases than ever before,
but NHS resources are finite. Who decides which patients
get priority when that resource 'cake' is shared out?
Priority setting will be one of the key controversies to be debated
at this year's Annual GP Forum at
the Royal Society of Medicine. The Forum (18-22 September) will
discuss several unique experiments from the UK and the US and debate
how they might be applied to a nationwide health system.
Among the speakers:
How
legal is postcode prescribing?
Dr Geoff Payne, GP, London
"Issues, controversies and legal implications"
A
health authority which decides to stop doing, say, sex
change operations, would actually be breaking current
UK law. Dr Payne's will look at the legal issues and
human rights controversies of health rationing in an
overview of priority setting here and abroad.
Patient
juries: a real alternative to waiting lists?
Dr Andrew Rouse, University of Birmingham
"Prioritisation: Let the People Choose"
We
have to be realistic about available health resources,
argues Dr Rouse, and someone has to decide which patients
will be excluded from treatment. In his opinion, it is "unelegant
and dishonest" to leave it to a waiting list system,
or to unaccountable decisions of individual doctors.
Dr Rouse will be discussing a radical new alternative
to waiting lists, based on his experience in the UK and
the US. His approach would involve lay people acting
as a jury to prioritise treatment, after hearing 'evidence'
from fellow patients or their GP advocates.
The
Oxford Experiment
Dr Sian Griffiths, Oxon Health Authority
"The Work of the Oxford Priorities Forum"
Whoever
makes budget decisions, the problem of limited resources
will not go away, Dr Griffiths points out. She will report
on the Oxford Priorities Forum, which for the last five
years has succeeded in bringing together GPs, Trusts,
Community Health Councils and patients to make those
difficult decisions in an open and accountable way.
Regional
variations "worse than ever before" for fertility treatment
Mr Adam Balen, General Infirmary,
Leeds
"Assisted Conception"
Despite
government promises, the healthcare 'postcode lottery'
is very real for couples seeking NHS fertility treatment,
claims Mr Balen. He will argue that modern infertility
therapies are "relatively inexpensive", and will update
GPs on the latest advances in the management of infertility.
[ends]
